- #WHAT MAC PROCESSOR IS BEST FOR VIDEO EDITING 1080P#
- #WHAT MAC PROCESSOR IS BEST FOR VIDEO EDITING UPGRADE#
- #WHAT MAC PROCESSOR IS BEST FOR VIDEO EDITING PRO#
They say that the 13 inch is snappy and “without hiccups” in day-to-day use, 1080p video editing in Adobe Premiere is no problem, but apparently 4K video “becomes unworkable”.
#WHAT MAC PROCESSOR IS BEST FOR VIDEO EDITING PRO#
So, how do these facts translate to real world 4K video editing? In their review of the 13-inch touch bar Macbook Pro 2016, the Verge offers some insights. In reality, the RAM speed should only have a minor impact on editing performance. Again, faster RAM unfortunately does not make up for the 16GB limit. There is one more difference though: it seems like t he non touch bar Macbook Pro uses 1866MHz LPDDR3 RAM while the touch bar version uses 2133MHz LPDDR3, making the RAM faster. 32 would be better and recommended for 4K video editing. In terms of RAM, unfortunately all Macbook Pro 2016 models max out at 16GB. This seems to be worse when connecting high-performance storage arrays like 4K editors usually do, so you should connect those only to the left-side ports. The two ports on the right side of the MacBook Pro have “reduced PCI Express bandwidth,” which Apple says means they have two PCIe 3.0 lanes worth of bandwidth at their disposal instead of the four lanes dedicated to the ports on the left side The non touch bar 2016 Macbook Pro only has two Thunderbolt 3 ports vs the four on the touch bar model. IFixit opened up the 13-inch Macbook Pro 2016Īccording to another source ( ) there are some other technical differences between the touch bar and non touch bar models that are worth pointing out:Īside from the CPU and GPU clock speed differences, the touch bar model’s 28W CPU can run faster for longer and throttles less frequently in comparison to the non touch bar 15W CPU. These results are in line with Engadget’s findings on their review, so they seem to be accurate. Its CPU multicore score is about 41% higher than the 13-inch models, but surprisingly it is weaker than the 2015 model… This tells me the non touch bar version and the touch bar version have a very similar speed. And if the touch bar is the only deciding factor between the two, then many people will probably decide to live without it.Īs expected, the 15-inch model scores much higher in terms of CPU performance, and just like last year’s model, it runs in a completely different class. So even though the touch bar CPU has 30% more Ghz, it is only 4% faster.Īlthough I’m confused by these results, they are also revealing, and looking at benchmarks before making a purchase decision seems like a very good idea. On the other hand, if you expect the 2016 13-inch model with touch bar and 2.9Ghz CPU to score much higher, you’d be mistaken again, as the 2.9Ghz version is only 3.8% faster than the non-touchbar version.
As you can see, the entry-level 2Ghz Macbook Pro 2016 13-inch model is slightly faster than last year’s 2015 retina Macbook Pro model with 2.7Ghz. These are Macworld’s multicore CPU results of the new Macbook Pro 2016. Macworld has taken a closer look at the specs of all new Macbook Pro models in their Macbook Pro 2016 review. When you look at benchmark scores you quickly see that even the entry-level, non touch bar 2016 model has some more power under the hood than expected. Is it slower than that? No, in reality it’s not that simple. The entry level Macbook Pro 2016 13-inch has a 2Ghz i5 processor, which sounds rather underwhelming considering my 2011 Macbook Pro had a 2.4ghz i5 processor. In other words, we need good specs and performance.
We all know that 4K editing performance is to a large degree dictated by a the speed of your machine.
#WHAT MAC PROCESSOR IS BEST FOR VIDEO EDITING UPGRADE#
This way, we can start to make out if the upgrade to a Macbook Pro 2016 is worth it for 4K video editing. While we do not have a Macbook Pro 2016 model for review at cinema5D just yet, we were very curious to see what other professionals are writing so far, and what the first benchmarks tests are revealing.
A few reviews and the first benchmarks have been published, and the results are rather surprising in both directions. But the new touch bar 13-inch and 15-inch models only arrived at customers’s doors today. Reviews for the Macbook Pro 2016 without the touch bar have been flooding the internet for the last two weeks, and we know for a fact that it isn’t fast enough to cope with a real life 4K workflow. But even for those who choose to overlook such shortcomings, one question remains unanswered: is the MacBook Pro 2016 fast enough in real life for 4K video editing? Macbook Pro 2016 Fast Enough for 4K or Not? The high price and low specs on paper have also earned criticism in many articles and forums. Many professional users voiced concerns about the removal of ports, among other things. As you probably know, Apple recently unveiled an entirely new line of Macbook Pros that introduced several changes to their design and functionality.
0 kommentar(er)
